In this series of articles we will take from the statements of Imaam Abdul-Aziz bin Baz, Imaam al-Albaani, Shaykh Abdullah al-Ghudayan, Shaykh Abdul-Aziz Aal ash-Shaykh, Shaykh Abdur-Razzaq al-Afeefee, Shaykh Ahmad an-Najmee, Shaykh Rabee' bin Haadee, Shaykh Ubayd al-Jaabiree, Shaykh Salih as-Suhaymee, Shaykh Abdul-Aziz ar-Raajihee and others to provide a framework of understanding regarding this subject. We will be drawing upon two fatwas mainly (the Permanent Committee of Major Scholars, and the Fiqh Council), and the sayings and remarks from some of the individual Scholars just mentioned.

Continuous Revolutions To Bring About the Collectivist, Communist, Humanist, Secular Order

You should recall from Part 2 in which we summarized the overall agenda, the secular communist collectivist order to compromise, dissolve and replace [revealed] religions with what is essentially a "new-age" religion. Here the Scholars make mention of the types of events these people have been and are involved in. And these events are used to further the agenda, so in this article we want to touch upon this aspect.

The Permanent Committee states (al-Ghudayan, al-Afeefee, al-Manee'):

Masonry is a secret political organization which seeks to destroy religions and virtuous characteristics (morals), and the institution of secular laws and non-religious [secular] order in their place. And it strives with [all] its effort to bring about continuous revolutions and the establishment of one (political) authority in place of another (a coup) through the claim of the freedom of thought, opinion, and creed.

And later in this same fatwa, there occurs:

...But it is in its reality and in its interior a call to permissiveness, to decay and (to) factors of turmoil, and disintegration in societies, and to the splitting of the handholds of nations and to the destructive, subversive annihilation of the edifice of legal injunctions and noble characteristics (morals) and the corruption and destruction of civilization (culture)...

And in the fatwa of the Fiqh Council (Ibn Baz, al-Humaid):

It has political aims, and it has a role and has [its] fingers - either open or hidden - in the majority of political and military revolutions, and the major (dangerous) upheavals [in the political landscape].

And Imaam al-Albani (rahimahullaah) said, as occurs in the tape "Silsilah al-Huda wan-Nur" (no. 420):

... However, they plot in reality, but as He, the Most High said, "They plot and Allaah too plots, and Allaah is the best of plotters", for this reason, just like it is not permissible for a Muslim to be a Socialist, or a Ba'thist, or a Communist, then likewise, it is not permissible for him to be a Freemason...

And in the treatise of Imaam Ibn Baz (أهمية العلم في محاربة الأفكار الهدامة), "The Importance of Knowledge in Fighting Destructive Ideologies", he refutes Communism and its Atheism and explains that they attempt to equate between everyone, man woman, child, father, mother, brother, sister [so the family is effectively destroyed, everyone belongs to the state, has no individuality and is part of a "collective"] and at the same time, they degrade the morals. He says:

And in this there is the most far-reaching refutation of the callers to Communism, Materialism, and Socialism and others who reject the existence of Allaah [the Creator]... Then the callers of Freemasonry come along, those who wish to return people to animalistic states, to equate between everything [meaning to remove the differences between man, woman, father, mother, brother, sister, child etc.], to wage war against the noblest of characteristics, and [against] the good deeds, so that they can make them like animals who cannot distinguish truth from falsehood and nor good from evil, and all of this is in opposition to what the Messengers (upon them be prayers and salutations) called to, and in opposition to what in is in inimitable Noble Qur'an and it is also in opposition to what the sound intellects, and sound natural innate dispositions which Allah created the servants upon. For Allaah, the Sublime, created mankind upon the acknowledgment of the noblest of characteristics, the benevolent, good deeds, and justice and truth. And hatred of oppression, transgression, and harm. Allaah created the servants with the distinction between the father from the son, the brother from the sister, and the wife from the husband, until even the animals make distinction between one and the other ...

In this quote Shaykh Ibn Baz (rahimahullaah) is refuting the atheistic philosophies, Socialism, Communism, Materialism, that arose in the 1800s, and he has mentioned how the callers of Freemasonry wish to demolish the order that Allaah placed in society, by removing the familial bonds, and corrupting the natural disposition (fitrah) of the individual, and equating between all members of the society - and this is the collectivism, Socialism, that these people want to rule the people by.

And Shaykh Abdul-Aziz ar-Rajihee stated in his book (القول البين الأظهر في الدعوة إلى الله والأمر بالمعروف والنهي عن المنكر ), "The Clear Manifest Saying in Calling to Allaah and Enjoining the Good and Forbidding the Evil", the following regarding Communism:

And the greatest disbelief, and its most severe is the rejection of the existence of Allaah and the worship of matter (materialism), and this is the foundational principle of atheistic, hateful, Communism, for their foundational principle is "There is no deity and life is [purely] matter [i.e. a material existence only]."

From the above quotes and what has preceded in other quotes in previous articles it is clear that they are behind political and military revolutions, major political upheavals, coups, and the likes, as well as social engineering to abolish the family institution and this is all part of helping to fulfill the stated agenda. The social engineering and eugenics is explicitly stated and outlined in their books, names to look out for are Bertrand Russell, H.G. Wells, George Bernard Shaw, the Huxley family, amongst others, who are all Communist, Collectivist, Eugenicists who wish to demolish the family institution and corrupt the moral fabric, exactly along the lines of what Shaykh Ibn Baz (rahimahullaah) has mentioned.

Wars, Revolutions, Upheavals, Order Out of Chaos, and Managing Nations and Societies

All the major and minor revolutions and wars that have occurred in Europe in particular (and other places in general) have been plotted and instigated by these people through the institution of Freemasonry. These revolutions gained momentum from the turn of the 19th century (1800s) but especially after the writing of "the Communist Manifesto" of Marx and Engels. You have to understand here that the overall agenda is World Socialism (Communism) with its own religion (new age spirituality and earth worship) to consume all religions, and it is to be run and maintained through scientific and technological means, and we gave a concise explanation of this agenda (as it is in their own books and writings), in Part 2 of this series.

So its necessary here that we explain Marxist-Socialism (Communism), as that has been the chief and principal subversive ideology and agenda used to take over nations and societies economically and politically. In a nutshell, Marx and Engels, in their Communist Manifesto, gave a particular interpretation of history in that class struggle is brought about through the misuse of capital by those who hold it, and this leads to injustice against the lower classes. To remove this, they advocate a revolution of the masses, as a result of which a state will be produced which runs on the planks of Communism.

This Communism is what is running most Western developed nations (just check how many of the ten planks of Communism your country is running on or heading towards), and they want to extend this to all nations and bring them under this umbrella, this is why nations are being standardized to a particular way of governance which then facilitates merging and total interdependence with other nations in which the system is already running. This is how they have put together the [Soviet] European Union, and its also how the new [Soviet] North American Union is being put together, and this regionalization of the world is in the books from the 1970s, its what the Club of Rome laid down, they want unions made up of blocs of countries, and in all these countries the aim is to standardize them, so they can be transitioned to a socialist, collectivist order.

If you think Communism died, you are dead wrong and there is no better person to tell you that than Mikhail Gorbachev himself. Communism never died. It did not crumble with the Berlin Wall. That was a public show to signal the end of "the Cold War" between two (apparently) competing ideologies of "Communism" and "Capitalism". What that signaled was a new era in which the time was right for the merging of both systems into a hybrid along the lines of what Marx and Engels intended (all capital in the hands of the state (the corporations), with everyone else ruled under Communism). Mr. Gorbachev will gleefully tell you this and in the early 1990s he was giving interviews stating that he envisages a coming together of Capitalism and Communism - and that's the system these people are working towards, it always has been: Everyone living in a socialist, collectivist, communist order (as equals, with the family unit abolished), whilst those who have amassed the capital in their hands rule over them. In post second-world war developed western nations, this system was being brought in gradually, through the tax-exempt foundations and think-tanks we have mentioned previously, who are behind the policies which the elected government implements.

So let's jump in and explain how the machinery has been working historically, you should recall from the previous articles that the institution of Freemasonry has been infiltrated and used for the agenda, and this agenda crystallized in the late 18th century, and it was written about by John Robison (Scottish Freemason) in 1798 in his book "Proofs of a Conspiracy: Against all the Religions and Governments of Europe, Carried on in the Secret Meetings of Freemasons, Illuminati and Reading Societies". The agenda was essentially the abolition of monarchies and governments and the abolition of [revealed] religions and the abolition of private property, the family and inheritance, and this was agenda in the late 18th century, present in a basic form. It was refined and expressed more clearly and laid out more fully in "the Communist Manifesto" written by Marx and Engels in 1848.

So lets look at how Communism was used as a starting point to abolish monarchies and governments and religion (through revolutions, coups) and to pave the way for 20th century democracies (left-right political parties), within the framework of which, the Communist agenda can be furthered through a gradual, progressive form of Communism (called Fabian Socialism).

Communism as a Subversive Revolutionary Manifesto

You should recall that Marxist-Socialism is an atheistic, materialist philosophy, and Marx himself said that Darwinism and Communism validate each other, and this is why these people promote the killing and wiping out of inferior races, that's what Marx advocated, he was a secular atheist Jew, and he despised [inferior] Jews as well as Slavs and others, and Darwin was a racist too, he spoke of the necessity of the survival of the "favored races" meaning elitist bigots like himself whose families only intermarry with each other to keep their stock "pure".

The purpose behind the Communist Manifesto was to give a fake presentation of history and of political and economic structures so that this particular "framing" could be used to demolish, rebuild, control and manage the politics of existing nations and monarchies and their economies. So what we are going to do here is to describe things as concisely as possible, we'll start off by making summary statements and then expand upon them.

The Communist Manifesto is the blueprint for the looting and stealing of the wealth of nations and destroying the sovereign authority of nations, societies and individuals. It's a slick intellectual fraud that outlines a fallacious interpretation of history with a false, engineered dichotomy of Capitalism and Communism ("conservative" and "labour") presented through the notion of "class struggle". It was used as an ideological means to mobilise revolutions, and it also paved the way for a political system that gave the illusion of democracy in the 19th and 20th centuries.

In most developed nations the political landscape is dominated by the conservative right and the socialist labour left. This classification is taken from Marx's "class struggle" and separates politics into the politics of classes, the capitalists and the labourers. Marx and Engels claimed that all nations are plagued by class struggle where the capitalists take advantage of everyone else (laborers, peasants, workers), and so they advocated a "workers'" (labour) revolution against the capitalists (conservative). The leaders of these revolutions led the masses against the monarchies and existing structures, leading them to believe that "private capital" is the great evil, making promises of an oppression-free "utopia" when these capitalists are removed and destroyed. However, when they got in power through these revolutions (which was their real goal all along), they then showed their colors and turned on the people, immediately killed off the undesirables (upon the Darwinian-Socialist principle of "survival of the fittest" and "preference of favored races" [because that's what they really meant]) and killed off anyone who was able to launch opposition (the middle classes, academics, intellectuals), and imposed a brutal Communistic rule, with abolition of private property, abolition of the family, centralized credit through a central bank, control of all means of production, communication, travel and so on which are the planks of Communism - and that was their goal all along.

This subversive ideology has been implemented historically and contemporaneously in a number of different ways.

The first: In the earlier years of this subversive ideology, they tried to force this system through violent revolutions such as what happened in Soviet Bolshevism (the Russian Revolution, Bolshevik International Socialism) - and this is one way of doing it, ferment revolution and impose the system, and then wipe out tens of millions of unwanted Christian peasants of the Ukraine and elsewhere by starvation and murder, these are the "useless eaters" of "inferior stock". At the same time you wipe out all the middle-class and academics, intellectuals who are the people who would be able to organize and manage resistance.

The second: Another way is to fund leaders into power through building popular sentiment within a nation, (German National Socialism), and when they come into power they start implementing their Socialist, Communist, Totalitarian rule and wipe out the inferior races such as the Jews and Gypsies and others. Wall Street will happily bring these people into power, and IBM will be right there to offer its technology to facilitate the process of tracking and monitoring.

The third: Another way is to impose this system through gradual means. And this is what is called Fabian Socialism and this is what's been running in the developed nations of Europe and the US after the second world war. "The Fabian Society" is a Marxist-Communist society, and it provides Marxist-Communists who come into the political arena and implement the desired policies (provided by the think-tanks) while they are in power. They implement Communism in gradual steps where the people don't realize that all the laws being enacted steadily and gradually over time are part of a scheme to ensnare the nation into a Soviet-type Communism, with the end result being the same in all cases.

In all these scenarios, the end goal or objective is always the same: abolition of private property, abolition of the family unit, centralization of credit, control of all means of communication, graduated system of taxation and so on, which are the planks of Communism.

In most 20th century developed western nations, the upheavals and changes of the previous century paved the way for the modern democracies, and democracy became the "beacon", but this is in reality just a fake democracy.

Within this fake illusionary democracy when you vote Labour in, they just carry out the socialist collectivist part of the agenda, which is socializing and collectivizing society, making them dependent on the state (through welfare), putting health care in the hands of the state, putting children in the care of the state and so on, which is your Socialism, collectivism for the masses. When you vote Conservatives in, they just work on the capitalist part of it favoring the big boys who are running the show, granting more power to the corporations (privatization of all national industry and infrastructure and giving it over to the corporations, which in turn are owned by the bankers at the top). And in an incremental fashion, over time, both parties (conservative and labour) actually work towards the same objective. They are two sides of the same coin in the pocket of the International Banker, while everybody else thinks they've been given "democracy".

This set up described above provides the fake political landscape on the basis of which the the masses understand and discuss "politics", that's the politics of the masses, and its all a smoke-screen and the (privately owned) media machinery keeps the discussion of politics within this landscape, and it gives you the figures and personalities that discuss, comment and analyze this political landscape. This is the politics of the blind-masses in most western secular nations claiming to have "democracy". Now if you read the books of these people (the political and intellectual elite) from the 1990s onwards and even earlier, you will find them saying that we are in the post-democratic era, and they say that democracy does not really work and cannot really work, its too sluggish, and things never get done when you have multiple parties trying to run a nation, a lot of time is wasted and it is not an efficient form of governing. In reality, the whole notion of pure democracy in the modern era touted by the non-Muslims is in fact a fraud. Which population of any "democratic" has voted to go to war by majority, or voted for increasing burdens of taxation, or voted for privatization of the nation's industry (paid for by the taxpayer in the first place), or for total surveillance? Isn't democracy the rule of the people by the people? So all of this is an outright fraud, and it makes you laugh when these people say, "We are proud of our democracy"! Fools, idiots!

The real governing takes place by a parallel government that is effectively hidden in plain sight. This comprises the tax-exempt think-tanks, foundations and NGOs and their front-organizations. They govern the nation by formulating policies, and they are not accountable to the public. And this is admitted by them, that this is how things truly run. So everybody falls for the illusion and does not know how their nation is really operating from an economical and political perspective. Remember, the media is privately-owned too, and they are not obliged to tell any truths, they are there to maintain that illusion and keep people distracted with sex, violence, sports, nudity, gossip, scandal and the likes, whilst private wealth and the fruits of private endeavor are looted in the background through the particular way the economy is set up, which is actually like this:

Your privately-owned central bank (a key-element of Communism) lends to the nation's "democratically elected" government its own currency at interest (they've just owned the entire economy through this). And no matter which government takes power over the years, it takes power whilst the nation is in debt [most developed nations are operating in bankruptcy and have been for a long time - this is whole different subject]. The "national debt" is the interest that needs to go to the bankers for use of their interest bearing currency. So when you lend currency to entire nations, you can then manipulate the economies through a) interest rates and b) varying the money supply, which then tightens your grip on the nation and allows the looting of its wealth and property through c) inflation, which is inherent to this system, and which is a stealth tax that lowers the purchasing power of the debt-based currency in the hands of the people, and d) through series of booms (lower the interest rates, get everybody borrowing, the economy expands, employment increases, everyone's happy, there appears to be affluence) and busts (hike your interest rates, call in your loans, restrict lending, and bankrupt all the fools who were caught up in debt they cannot immediately pay back). Repetition of this process in successive waves gradually transfers all wealth to the issuers of money (who created it from thin-air in the first place). Booms and boosts are inherent to the system by default and by design.

Western secular governments are really just bureaucrats in the middle, between the collateral for the debt (the people) and the bankers lending the currency at interest. They are run in reality by tax exempt think tanks and foundations who in turn are set up and paid for by the bankers who are really and truly in control of a nations politics, finance and economics - since whoever prints the money is in ultimate control and that's the great secret of high-finance, and thus the Ashkenazi banker declared, "Let me issue a nation's money and I care not who makes it's laws" - and he's absolutely right.

Now, coming back to the nations politics, whether you have a Labour or Conservative, or Republican or Democratic head of state, his advisers ALWAYS come from the same think tanks and foundations that are set up and paid for by the International Bankers. When you understand this, you will understand how secular nations are really run and you will realize how the average non-Muslim, in fact the vast majority of the learned non-Muslims are deceived and are grossly ignorant of the stark realities of the so-called democracy they think they have got and which they have been boasting about.

The Dark History of Materialist Secular Philosophies

From the above you can see the reality of the materialist philosophies of the 19th and 20th centuries, Secular Humanism, Social Darwinism, Marxism, Communism and so on. These atheistic philosophies, coupled with usurious banking, have been behind wars, revolutions, coups, bloodshed and slaughter of scores of millions of innocents ever since this agenda of a collectivist, secular order was put in motion at the turn of the 19th century (1800s). And this is simply the manifestation of the enslavement by man of man, in which the the law is "the survival of the fittest" so whoever is the most psychopathic, cunning, conniving, treacherous and murderous will obviously dominate and that's what it's all about in reality. This agenda has been implemented covertly through the institution of Freemasonry in its initial phases, and it continues, hidden in plain-sight, through the foundations and think-tanks that were put in place in the early part of the 20th century, to guide governments towards socialist, communist, collectivist ideals whilst the face of democracy is shown to the masses. Now that the democratic era is over, and you can see with the "Soviet" European Union (and the "Sovietization" of North American) the voice of the people means absolutely nothing. This is the same envisaged model for the rest of the world where the system has not been fully implemented, where there exists strong national identity, the presence of national riches (minerals, oils etc.), and a strong culture.